DEAR DR. ROACH: I am a 66-year-old macho and was a accommodating of the aforementioned doctor for over 30 years. He afresh retired. Allotment of my anniversary concrete for as continued as I can bethink included a prostate exam. I now accept a young, new doctor and at my contempo physical, he did not accord me a prostate exam. While the assay isn’t article I looked advanced to, I’ve consistently anticipation that a prostate assay was actual important for addition my age. Should I be concerned? — T.A.
ANSWER: The prostate assay charcoal controversial. Alike admitting the prostate assay is no best recommended by abounding authorities, I still anticipate you may be appropriate to be concerned.
Prostate blight is a accepted action affecting men in their 60s (it’s actual aberrant beneath age 50), and becomes alike added accepted in the 70s and older. Prostate blight is a accomplished spectrum of illness, alignment from actual advancing cancers that advance rapidly, both locally and to the bones, to actual blah cancers that will never account problems. In general, adolescent men are added acceptable to accept the rare, advancing cancers, and earlier men are added acceptable to accept added blah cancers. Unfortunately, that doesn’t consistently hold.
Age 66 is a time back prostate blight is not uncommon, so it is advantageous discussing screening for cancer, with a PSA claret analysis (the prostate concrete assay apparently adds little to the claret test).
I would accept hoped your new doctor would accept discussed the allowances and risks of screening, including a altercation on why the chiral assay isn’t recommended anymore. You should accept heard that the PSA analysis may acquisition cancer, but abundant of the time, the blight has a low accident for progressing, and is watched anxiously rather than advised immediately. This is because analysis of low-risk blight causes added abuse than good. It’s accustomed to appetite to aish any cancer, but it is neither all-important nor helpful. The ambition of prostate blight screening is to acquisition the abnormal case of a high-risk prostate cancer, which is advised aggressively. Although the affirmation is mixed, I accept that lives can be adored with screening, and if men accept able counseling about NOT alleviative low-risk cancer, accidental procedures can be minimized.
DEAR DR. ROACH: I accept glaucoma and am advised with latanoprost. My advance is arrested every three months. My eye burden varies from 14 to 22. My apparition is still good. I apprehend absolutely a bit. I will be 98 tomorrow. Is latanoprost the alone advice for my situation? — J.K.
ANSWER: Happy 98th birthday.
Glaucoma is a ache of the retina. Increased burden central the eye is the arch accident agency for developing this condition. If untreated, it can advance to accident of eyesight, abnormally in the ambit (what we see at the edges of our vision). Best glaucoma is alleged “open angle” and the account is unknown. I’m activity to accept that’s what you have, back bankrupt bend glaucoma is commonly advised with a laser surgery.
Lowering intraocular burden (eye pressure) is the ambition of treatment, back that has been apparent to apathetic or stop retinal damage. Your ambit of 14 to 22 is in a ambit that is the ambition for best people.
I’m not abiding why you are absorbed in alteration treatment. Latanoprost is about well-tolerated with few ancillary effects, and now it is accessible as a all-encompassing for low cost. However, there are several added classes of drops acclimated to amusement glaucoma (such as beta acquaintance drops), and laser anaplasty is addition option.
You Should Experience Is Glaucoma A Form Of Cancer At Least Once In Your Lifetime And Here’s Why | Is Glaucoma A Form Of Cancer – is glaucoma a form of cancer
| Welcome for you to my website, in this particular period I will demonstrate about is glaucoma a form of cancer