Exhibit
Exhibit | assignment of proprietary lease form

Five Taboos About Assignment Of Proprietary Lease Form You Should Never Share On Twitter | Assignment Of Proprietary Lease Form

Posted on

I’ve accounting about this issue:  in a association acreage state, does the apron of an artist own the patent?  The acknowledgment every “family law” able I apperceive of says yes; every apparent advocate says “no.”  It’s appear up in at atomic one CAFC opinion, and now came up tangentially in a non-prec assessment that did not adjudge the issue.  That case, Taylor v. Taylor Made Plastics, Inc., is here. (Why does the assessment alarm James Taylor “James T.” and his wife “Mary T.”?)

Exhibit - assignment of proprietary lease form
Exhibit – assignment of proprietary lease form | assignment of proprietary lease form

Here’s my commodity on this, which I anticipate I acquaint a few months ago somewhere. Someday this is activity to matter, big time, or not!

DRAFT

A Fifty-Fifty Split:  What if the Apron of Every Artist in a Association Acreage Accompaniment has an Absorbed Absorption in an Invention?

By David Hricik*

I. Introduction

If you anticipate the appellation raises a agrarian possibility, accede what happened in a contempo case appealed to the Federal Circuit.  Afterwards actuality sued for infringement, the actor had the ex-wife of the artist finer admission to it any absorption she had in the patent-in-suit.  As a result, the actor argued that there could be no infringement, both because abridgement of continuing and because it had acquired an absorbed absorption in the patent.

It about worked.

The Federal Circuit accustomed that beneath California law the apparent was “presumptively association acreage in which [the wife] had an absorbed bisected interest.”  Fortunately for the accused infringer, the wife had not listed the apparent as association acreage back she was divorcing, and so the cloister captivated that res judicata precluded her from arguing that she in actuality had an absorption in the patent.

But, the odd facts of that case should not accord abundant comfort.  It is important to admit that if commodity is association property, it agency it belongs to both spouses.  If the apron of every artist in a association acreage accompaniment has an absorbed according absorption in every apparent accepted during alliance to the added spouse, again administration of inventors may charge to access appointment of both spouse’s interests for the employer to access abounding title. If that is the law, again abounding apparent contravention apparel can advance abandoned if the apron of the artist is aing as a party.  If that is the law, abounding companies do not own, outright, the patents that they access they do.

This commodity shows, first, that every cloister that has addressed the affair has captivated that a apparent issued during alliance to one apron is association property.  Second, abounding states authority that acreage rights can appear above-mentioned to issuance, and sometimes alike at the time of conception.  Third, it shows that the accepted aphorism appears to acquiesce aloof one apron to alienate claimed association property, but with some exceptions.  Finally, it describes the implications for this anatomy of law on apparent practitioners.

2. Basal Association Acreage Law

No federal statute addresses buying of a apparent application, let abandoned an “idea” that has artlessly been conceived: accompaniment law would apply. Likewise, the catechism of who has appellation to alike an issued apparent is a catechism of accompaniment law.

Eleven states currently chase association acreage law:  Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Louisiana, New Mexico, Nevada, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin. Obviously, the laws of these states acceptable alter decidedly on some issues, but a few basal credibility access accurate amid them all:

The statutes of several association acreage states accommodate that anniversary apron has a present, vested, one-half buying absorption in association acreage with according management…. The according administration statutes accord anniversary apron authoritative rights over association property.  A apron may anticipate the disposition of assertive association assets by the added spouse. Further, either apron may adjustment debts during the alliance that may be annoyed with association property.

Agreement Sample | a guide to florida - assignment of proprietary lease form
Agreement Sample | a guide to florida – assignment of proprietary lease form | assignment of proprietary lease form

The abstraction bidding in the aboriginal book is account repeating, back those alien with association acreage law about anticipate of it as mattering abandoned aloft divorce. This is alarmingly incorrect: back commodity is association property, anniversary apron owns it – again and there, not aloof in annulment court.  Also, it is important to accent that the association assumably owns all acreage acquired during marriage, anniversary apron captivation an absorbed according interest.[6]

With these basal attempt in mind, the aboriginal catechism is what is “property” beneath these statutes, and does it accommodate bookish acreage and, best particularly, inventions, apparent applications, and patents?

2. “Property” Includes Patents, and Sometimes Applications and Alike Abstract Bookish Property. 

As one would expect, “property” is construed absolute broadly.[7]  As one cloister stated:

The chat “property” is in law a all-encompassing appellation of all-encompassing application. It is not bedfast to absolute or anatomical objects, but is a chat of almighty ample meaning. It is a accepted appellation to baptize the appropriate of buying and includes every accountable of whatever nature, aloft which such a appropriate can accurately attach. It includes choses in activity and is active to announce any admired appropriate or absorption adequate by law and the accountable aggregate or things in which rights or interests exists.[8]

An issued apparent is, of course, by federal statute to be advised as claimed acreage beneath accompaniment law.[9]  Thus, assumably a apparent acquired by one apron during alliance belongs to the community, not abandoned to the inventor.[10]

Numerous annulment courts access disconnected patents issued during alliance as “property” beneath association acreage statutes[11]  Typically these courts access a apparent issued during alliance is association acreage and do not assay whether that acceptance is correct.[12]   Occasionally a cloister engages in at atomic a accessory aggregate of analysis.  For example, a Florida appellate cloister declared that “[c]ourts alfresco Florida access accomplished the aforementioned analytic cessation — a apparent is claimed acreage that may be the accountable of candid administration back the artist and his or her apron deliquesce their marriage.”[13] The Kansas Supreme Cloister is the abandoned cloister to access affianced in a diffuse assay of the question, advertence in part:

Vincent believes that the absorption in the patents does not access the qualities listed [in the analogue of property.] This is not self-evident….

[I]ntellectual property, already it has been created, is beneath accordingly accompanying to its creditor than added assets now characterized as conjugal property, such as pensions and able goodwill. Unlike pensions and able goodwill, rights in bookish acreage are awful transferable, and appellation may be placed in the name of one who did not originally aftermath them.[14]

The point actuality is that accompaniment courts either access or readily achieve that patents issued during alliance are association property.

In some states, a apron has interests alike afore the apparent issues, depending on which access to the “inception of title” commodity the administration takes:

Arguably, birth [of title] may activity at any of three times:  (1) back the abstraction is abundantly developed to achieve a plan to body the apparatus [i.e., conception]; (2) back the apparatus is absolutely congenital [i.e., absolute abridgement to practice]; or (3) on the able date of the apparent [i.e., able abridgement to practice].[15]

Courts access activated anniversary view, admitting about not appliance the affiliated acceding of art that apparent practitioners would accretion comforting.

As an archetype of the aboriginal view, a California cloister disconnected patents that had been “perfected” during alliance but issued afterward.[16]  In addition, in a attenuate case that provided somewhat continued discussion, a Florida appellate cloister articular that a apparent appliance was acreage that was accountable to candid assay because it had been “deemed abundantly able-bodied developed to abide to the federal apparent authorities on a non-provisional basis.”[17]

Blumberg Law Forms. This Catalog lists all Blumberg Forms in paper ..
Blumberg Law Forms. This Catalog lists all Blumberg Forms in paper .. | assignment of proprietary lease form

As an archetype of the third view, a Washington appellate cloister captivated that a apparent issued during the alliance was association acreage alike admitting the apparatus had been conceived above-mentioned to marriage.[18]

Some courts access a abashed appearance that seems to reflect both the third and aboriginal views.  For example, the Supreme Cloister of Hawaii declared that “a apparent does not abide until it is granted,” and so there was no acreage appropriate “unless and until the apparent issues.”[19] Nonetheless, it accustomed that in authoritative candid assay balloon courts should actuate “whether there was aggregate in the pre-patent abstract bookish acreage and the apparent itself.”[20]

This shows that patents, and in some states applications and alike abandoned conceived inventions, are “property.” All acreage acquired during alliance is assumably association property, acceptance to both spouses, not aloof the inventor.

The access of accompaniment courts and accompaniment annulment attorneys to this catechism stands in abrupt adverse to accepted apparent practice, at atomic as I apperceive it.  In my acquaintance apparent practitioners do not access assignments from an inventor’s spouse.  Similarly, a key argument on acquisitions makes no acknowledgment of conjugal rights alike as a allotment of due activity during accretion of patents.  I access never apparent litigated the catechism of whether an inventor’s apron charge be aing as an basal affair to a apparent contravention brought by the inventor’s assignee.

The applesauce amid how apparent attorneys and annulment attorneys attending at conjugal rights is significant:  if the accompaniment courts are right, again spouses may access rights in patents that assignees may anticipate they own outright.  If the apron has an absorbed according absorption in the patent, again they access the able appropriate to do absolutely what the abettor can: sue, license, or contrarily achieve the patent.  Either accompaniment annulment courts or apparent attorneys access it wrong.

Whether those rights abide agency turns on the countless facts that can arise, as able-bodied as appliance of accurate accompaniment law. This commodity cannot appraise all the permutations, but instead aing includes several scenarios that may frequently appear area accompaniment courts access begin that the apron holds an buying interest.  It concludes by anecdotic abeyant avenues to abate the ambiguity that may face assignees, attorneys, inventors, and spouses.

II. Federal Statutes Governing Buying of Patents and Accepted Practice

The Constitution of the United States rejects the hypothesis that inventions should at atomic initially accord to anyone added than their creator.  In ablaze of this, federal statutes accommodate that a apparent charge be activated for in the name of the inventor.  If annihilation added is done, the apparent will affair in the inventor’s name.  At that point, accompaniment law determines ownership.  “It is important to agenda that abandoned inventorship, the catechism of who absolutely invented the accountable aggregate claimed in a patent,’ is a catechism of federal apparent law.  ‘Ownership, however, is a catechism of who owns acknowledged appellation to the accountable aggregate claimed in the patent, patents accepting attributes of claimed property.’”  Consequently, for example, absent accounting assignment, an inventor’s employer will not own any apparent allotment the abettor as the inventor.  This is accurate alike if the abettor uses abandoned the employer’s accessories to achieve the apparatus and is paid a accepted bacon while conceiving of or abbreviation to convenance the patented invention.

State law determines whether there is an obligation of appointment and its scope.  By federal statute, assignments are to be construed beneath accompaniment law.  Thus, the Supreme Cloister has captivated that accompaniment courts “may try questions of title, and may assay an achieve affairs apropos to patents.”  Similarly, accompaniment intestacy laws administer buying of patents of asleep inventors, and adopted intestacy laws administer patents endemic by adopted individuals.

There are added affairs area accompaniment law determines buying of an invention.  The point actuality is that annihilation in the Apparent Act, at least,  indicates that accompaniment conjugal acreage law should not additionally apply.  Thus, absent operation of accompaniment law to the contrary, the artist owns the patent.

As a result, it is accepted for corporations and added entities that administer those acceptable to ad-lib patents to crave that advisers accredit any buying rights to the entity. The acceptance is that because the artist has assigned his apparatus to the entity, the commodity holds abounding acknowledged title, and appropriately is the not aloof the abandoned affair with continuing to achieve the patent, but additionally the abandoned affair all-important to achieve the patent. All rights, attorneys and assignees believe, accord to the assignee.

Consistent with this convenance and beliefs, in my acquaintance no apparent advocate seeks appointment of any appropriate from any inventor’s spouse.  The anatomy appointment acclimated by apparent practitioners that originated with the USPTO does not do so. Thus, if the apron has an interest, again on its face the archetypal anatomy and convenance do not achieve appointment of the spouse’s interest, abnormally – for affidavit that will become bright —  if the appointment is acquired afterwards the apparent has issued.  The aing catechism is: does the apron access an interest?

III. Accompaniment Cloister Appliance of Association Acreage Laws to Apparent Ownership

The absolute contours of anniversary accurate association acreage accompaniment are aloft the ambit of this article.  No agnosticism in accurate affairs those facts will aggregate greatly.  However, three basal attempt access to administer beyond the jurisdictions, with no agnosticism differences at their margins but not at their core.

WM133.Coop Addendum.133.13
WM133.Coop Addendum.133.13 | assignment of proprietary lease form

First, the association assumably owns all acreage acquired during marriage, anniversary apron captivation an absorbed according absorption in the whole.   While it is aloof that – a anticipation – nonetheless it is the starting point.

Second, with attenuated exceptions addressed below, one apron cannot alienate association property; abandoned both spouses can.  For example, a Louisiana statute provides:

A apron may not alienate, encumber, or charter to a third being his absorbed absorption in the association or in accurate things of the association above-mentioned to the abortion of the regime.

Under this statute, any adjustment not active by both spouses to alienate association acreage is void.

Again, the statutes and case law do vary.  Washington has a agnate statute, but requires that both parties assurance any acceding carrying association acreage abandoned if it is absolute property.  Thus, it may be that in some association acreage states patents may be alienable by abandoned the inventor.

Third, with account to personalty, “property” is construed absolute broadly.  As one cloister stated:

The chat “property” is in law a all-encompassing appellation of all-encompassing application. It is not bedfast to absolute or anatomical objects, but is a chat of almighty ample meaning. It is a accepted appellation to baptize the appropriate of buying and includes every accountable of whatever nature, aloft which such a appropriate can accurately attach. It includes choses in activity and is active to announce any admired appropriate or absorption adequate by law and the accountable aggregate or things in which rights or interests exists.

Patents are, of course, by federal statute to be advised as claimed acreage beneath accompaniment law.  Thus, assumably a apparent acquired by one apron during alliance belongs to the community, not abandoned to the inventor.  As aing shown, that is in actuality the aftereffect that the courts access analogously accomplished in the ancestors law context, back acclamation divorce, alimony, or adolescent support.

While patents are claimed acreage and advised as such by accompaniment courts, there is beneath acceding on whether abstract bookish acreage that leads to or could advance to a apparent is association property.  The “inception of title” commodity is a analytical abstraction in association acreage states, and conceivably should be to apparent lawyers, because if appellation is acquired above-mentioned to marriage, that acreage is abandoned owned. Thus, for example, if a bedmate conceives of an apparatus during marriage, and again gets divorced, the apron may access an absorption in any consistent patent.  Conversely, if appellation abandoned arises back the apparent issues, again the apron would access no absorption in patents issued afterwards annulment from an active inventor.

The accompaniment courts access accustomed that birth of appellation to apparent rights can activity afore a apparent issues:

 Arguably, birth [of title] may activity at any of three times:  (1) back the abstraction is abundantly developed to achieve a plan to body the apparatus [i.e., conception]; (2) back the apparatus is absolutely congenital [i.e., absolute abridgement to practice]; or (3) on the able date of the apparent [i.e., able abridgement to practice].

Courts access adopted the additional view.  For example, a Washington appellate cloister captivated that a apparent issued during the alliance was association acreage alike admitting the apparatus had been conceived above-mentioned to marriage.  A California cloister additionally disconnected patents which had been “perfected” during marriage.  In a attenuate case that provided somewhat continued discussion, a Florida appellate cloister articular that a apparent appliance was accountable to candid assay because it had been “deemed abundantly able-bodied developed to abide to the federal apparent authorities on a non-provisional basis.”  Thus, a apron can access an absorption in apparent applications filed during marriage, not aloof patents issued during marriage.

Some courts access a abashed appearance that seems to reflect both the third and aboriginal views.  For example, the Supreme Cloister of Hawaii declared that “a apparent does not abide until it is granted,” and so there was no appropriate adequate “unless and until the apparent issues.” Nonetheless, it accustomed that in authoritative candid assay balloon courts should actuate “whether there was aggregate in the pre-patent abstract bookish acreage and the apparent itself.”  Further, it captivated that a barter abstruse became association acreage back the barter abstruse had anon absolute value.  “[O]ne ‘owns’ a barter abstruse back one knows of it….”  This captivation could, of course, actualize a battle amid the spouses over whether to book for a apparent appliance or to advance aegis of the apparatus abandoned as a barter secret. The employer’s interests may battle with the spouse’s.

Numerous courts access disconnected patents issued during alliance as “property” beneath association acreage afterwards defective to abode whether birth of appellation could access occurred earlier.  Several cases access artlessly affected that patents are association acreage accountable to assay by aloof adding them.

FAIRVIEW OWNERS CORP, - assignment of proprietary lease form
FAIRVIEW OWNERS CORP, – assignment of proprietary lease form | assignment of proprietary lease form

Typically these courts access a apparent issued during alliance is association acreage and do not assay whether that acceptance is correct.   Occasionally a cloister engages in at atomic a accessory aggregate of analysis.  For example, a Florida appellate cloister declared that “[c]ourts alfresco Florida access accomplished the aforementioned analytic cessation — a apparent is claimed acreage that may be the accountable of candid administration back the artist and his or her apron deliquesce their marriage.”  The point actuality is that frequently accompaniment courts either access or readily achieve that patents issued during alliance are association property.

The Kansas Supreme Cloister is the abandoned cloister to access affianced in a diffuse assay of the question, stating:

Vincent believes that the absorption in the patents does not access the qualities listed [in the analogue of property.] This is not self-evident. The business plan, which is congenital on the patented concept, assuredly will be acclimated in an accomplishment to accession basic for the enterprise. Thus, there is a faculty in which the patents may be said to access accommodation value. Another, conceivably added typical, adjustment is for a apparent holder to access into a licensing acceding with a manufacturer/distributor for use of a patent. Appliance beneath the licensing acceding ability be a agglomeration sum. An antecedent fee and royalties is addition acceptable anatomy for appliance to take.

The cloister went on to accompaniment that:

  [I]ntellectual property, already it has been created, is beneath accordingly accompanying to its creditor than added assets now characterized as conjugal property, such as pensions and able goodwill. Unlike pensions and able goodwill, rights in bookish acreage are awful transferable, and appellation may be placed in the name of one who did not originally aftermath them.

Thus, accompaniment courts either assume, conclude, or access captivated that patents issued during alliance are association property.  The most-cited argument by these courts as advertence that patents are association acreage does not aggressively booty that position, instead discussing the cases and advertence amid added things that “a apron would apprehend to allotment as absolutely in bookish acreage acquired during alliance as in any added array of property.”

Finally, while acutely assets from patents that are association acreage belongs to the community, the majority of courts that access addressed the affair access additionally captivated that assets accustomed during a alliance from alike abandoned endemic patents is association property.

III. Federal Law Allowing for Case by Persons With a Proprietary Absorption in the Appliance May Admittance Spouses to Ascendancy or Interfere with Prosecution.

While it is bright that an abettor of the absolute absorption in appliance may arraign it, federal law sometimes permits alike those with abandoned a “proprietary interest” to abide and alike undertake prosecution, at atomic area the artist refuses to do so. Specifically, Section 118 of the Apparent Act states:

Whenever an artist refuses to assassinate an appliance for patent, or cannot be begin or accomplished afterwards active effort, [1] a being to whom the artist has assigned or agreed in autograph to accredit the apparatus or [2] who contrarily shows acceptable proprietary absorption in the aggregate acknowledgment such action, may achieve appliance for apparent on account of and as abettor for the artist on affidavit of the pertinent facts and a assuming that such activity is all-important to bottle the rights of the parties or to anticipate irreparable damage; and the Director may admission a apparent to such artist aloft such apprehension to him as the Director deems sufficient, and on acquiescence with such regulations as he prescribes.

The PTO has interpreted this statute to admittance heirs, for example, to not abandoned abide case aloft the afterlife of an inventor, but to book an appliance for an artist who dies above-mentioned to filing the application.  The brood appropriately charge access a proprietary absorption in the appliance or patent.

Does a apron in a association acreage state?  The acceptation of “proprietary interest” would access to beset rights of a apron in a association acreage state.  “A ‘proprietary’ absorption at the absolute atomic suggests some aspect of buying or dominion….”  Given, as apparent above, that a apron in a association acreage accompaniment may access an absorbed according absorption in the patent, that absorption would acutely authorize as “ownership or dominion.”  Thus, federal law would access to admittance apron to ascendancy case if the artist dies.

IV. Possible Ways to Defeat a Spouse’s Interest

A. Federal Preemption of Accompaniment Association Acreage Law

Recognition Agreement Industrial Relations In Europe Trade Union ..
Recognition Agreement Industrial Relations In Europe Trade Union .. | assignment of proprietary lease form

Courts access analogously captivated that accompaniment law determines buying of patents – in every ambience in which the affair has arisen.  Federal law appropriately is captivated to apply, and so there is no conflict, and annihilation to accroach accompaniment law.

In fact, the few courts that access analyzed whether federal law preempts accompaniment law access anniversary abandoned preemption, admitting afterwards accurate analysis.   Annulment attorneys access there is no battle amid accompaniment and federal law.  As a arch analyst wrote:

The federal statute on the alteration of patents, 35 U.S.C. § 261, states about that patents aggregate acreage and that they are accountable to assignment. Courts because the affair access captivated that an inventor’s creditors can ability the inventor’s patents, although with somewhat added adversity than added types of assets. 60 Am. Jur. 2d Patents § 1168 (1987). Given these points, there is accepted acceding that federal law does not anticipate a cloister from alleviative a apparent as divisible acreage in a annulment case.

Significantly, accompaniment courts access not analyzed this catechism at length, but instead access to access the hypothesis that apparent law does not accroach accompaniment association acreage law.  Accompaniment courts consistently bisect patents amid divorcing spouses — admitting federal statutes and the Constitution and the accessible federal antecedent of apparent rights.

There is a acumen amid the cases that administer accompaniment law relied aloft by these courts and applying accompaniment law in this context:  in the added instances, the accompaniment law determines who owns a apparent or appliance from the inventor, while appliance of association acreage law divests sole buying from the inventor.

B. The Exception for Sole Administration Association Property

Some states acquiesce one apron to alienate assertive property, alike if association property.  The Washington Statute quoted above, for example, requires both spouses to accord to breach of real, but not personal, property.

Other states admit agnate doctrines, including acquainted that some association acreage is, nonetheless, accountable to the “sole management” of one spouse.  Beneath this doctrine, it may be that an apparatus qualifies as “sole management” association property, and so appointment by the apron is not required

C. Estoppel

Estoppel acceptable would not be a advantageous apparatus at atomic in those states that crave that both spouses appoint in the conduct that gives acceleration to the estoppel.  So, for example, in an Arizona case the actuality that the bedmate affianced in conduct that ability access estopped him from abstinent an acceding to advertise acreage did not beggarly that the wife, or the association was estopped.  While facts could of advance accord acceleration to an estoppel adjoin both, in accepted affairs that seems unlikely.

IV. Appliance of Accompaniment Law to Accepted Actuality Patterns

As explained in the introduction, accused infringers access aloft buying interests in spouses as a aegis to continuing in a few cases, but access absent due to procedural issues.  The case law suggests that there may be added opportunities for this defense, and some barbed issues apropos buying of absolute patents that attorneys and owners of bookish acreage charge to consider.

Suppose, for example, that an artist acquires a apparent while married.  If the client fails to access appointment from the spouse, again the client may access abandoned an absorbed according absorption with the inventor’s spouse.

Or, accept that the abettor is accountable to an obligation to accredit any apparent issued during assignment.  The apron may access an absorption in a apparent appliance filed on that apparatus afore the obligation to accredit the apparent arises.  Again, the declared assignor may own abandoned an according absorbed absorption in the patent.

Co-op Share Loan Documentation Requirements - PDF - assignment of proprietary lease form
Co-op Share Loan Documentation Requirements – PDF – assignment of proprietary lease form | assignment of proprietary lease form

There are countless actuality patterns that could arise.  Accompaniment law may accommodate the acknowledgment to some of them, advertence that the apron has no interest, or that the artist abandoned can alienate the property.  But area accompaniment law indicates that the apron has an interest, again abandoned if accompaniment law is preempted or the apron assigns its absorption can the abettor feel adequate in assertive it owns abounding and bright title.

V. Conclusion: What to Do?

As acclaimed at the outset, this commodity was advised to accession the issues arising from the adverse approaches of annulment attorneys and apparent attorneys to apparent ownership.  It may be that accompaniment laws will charge to be adapted to exclude patents from association property, or to acquiesce for the artist to alienate all rights afterwards its spouse’s consent.  It may be that a action of application charge be that the apron either abandon any association acreage rights or to admittance the artist to alienate any bookish acreage rights afterwards permission.

In awaiting cases, there may be continuing defenses that can be raised, back the plaintiff may not access abounding title.  Further, decidedly barbed issues may face corporations that access acquired bookish acreage from inventors or from baby companies in aggregate afterwards due activity on these issues.

Five Taboos About Assignment Of Proprietary Lease Form You Should Never Share On Twitter | Assignment Of Proprietary Lease Form – assignment of proprietary lease form
| Allowed for you to my blog, within this time period I’ll teach you concerning assignment of proprietary lease form
.

The Cooperative Offering Plan for leasehold cooperative ownership of ..
The Cooperative Offering Plan for leasehold cooperative ownership of .. | assignment of proprietary lease form
Contract of Sale - Cooperative Apartment | White Plains - assignment of proprietary lease form
Contract of Sale – Cooperative Apartment | White Plains – assignment of proprietary lease form | assignment of proprietary lease form
What is an Aztech Co-op Recognition Agreement? | ELIKA Real Estate - assignment of proprietary lease form
What is an Aztech Co-op Recognition Agreement? | ELIKA Real Estate – assignment of proprietary lease form | assignment of proprietary lease form
Blumberg New York Co-Operative Apartment Lease and Sale Forms; Adapt ..
Blumberg New York Co-Operative Apartment Lease and Sale Forms; Adapt .. | assignment of proprietary lease form
Blumberg New York Co-Operative Apartment Lease and Sale Forms; Adapt ..
Blumberg New York Co-Operative Apartment Lease and Sale Forms; Adapt .. | assignment of proprietary lease form
The Aztec Recognition Agreement | nyc BLOG estate | New York City ..
The Aztec Recognition Agreement | nyc BLOG estate | New York City .. | assignment of proprietary lease form

Gallery for Five Taboos About Assignment Of Proprietary Lease Form You Should Never Share On Twitter | Assignment Of Proprietary Lease Form